IRS Admits SCOTUS Found It Unconstitutional In 1895

From the IRS website: http://www.irs.gov/irs/article/0,,id=149200,00.html

IRS Unconstitutional-H

IRS Unconstitutional-H

Thanks Monty

Advertisements

ALERT! Obama Preparing To Reinstate The Draft – And Other Tyrannical Edicts

Executive Order — National Defense Resources Preparedness

Released Friday, March 16 2012. No time is given, but presumably the customary after-hours-weekend-cover time was used.

This thing needs to be scrutinized and understood by everyone. It’s rather lengthy and as yet hasn’t been thoroughly vetted, but of particular interest is Section 601-2

(2)  upon request by the Director of Selective Service, and in coordination with the Secretary of Defense, assist the Director of Selective Service in development of policies regulating the induction and deferment of persons for duty in the armed services;

Looks like a draft, doesn’t it. Also notice that they are asserting the authority to take over virtually everything in the event of a “national emergency”, including food, water and transportation.

The White House Release Page

http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/03/16/executive-order-national-defense-resources-preparedness

A PDF of the above page

2012-0316-EO-NationalDefenseResourcesPreparedness.pdf

Don’t forget, this is from an administration that asserts it needs only international permission to deploy American military as per the below video of Defense Secretary Leon Panetta in senate committee:

GOOD GRIEF – DOES THIS GIVE  YOU CONCERN ABOUT ANOTHER FALSE FLAG?

ALERT – Media Blackout Of Obama Impeachment – H. Con. Res. 107

This bill introduced in the house on March 7, 2012, lays out a case for impeachment of Obama (AKA Barry Soetoro) on grounds of conducting wars without congressional authorization. Yet, the media this weekend are talking about Rush Limbaugh and Peyton Manning.

PLEASE SPREAD

A PDF of the bill from gpo.gov

http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-112hconres107ih/pdf/BILLS-112hconres107ih.pdf

Thomas.gov page for this bill

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c112:H.CON.RES.107:

Govtrack page for this bill

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=hc112-107

I’ve yet to find the bill on OpenCongress.org

For good measure, you can also download the pdf  directly from freemartinnow.wordpress.com:

H. Con. Res. 107 – 2012-0307

IV
112 TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. CON. RES.  107
Expressing the sense of Congress that the use of offensive military force
by a President without prior and clear authorization of an Act of Con-gress constitutes an impeachable high crime and misdemeanor under
article II, section 4 of the Constitution.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
MARCH 7, 2012
Mr. JONES submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred
to the Committee on the Judiciary

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of Congress that the use of offensive
military force by a President without prior and clear
authorization of an Act of Congress constitutes an im-peachable high crime and misdemeanor under article II,
section 4 of the Constitution.

Whereas the cornerstone of the Republic is honoring
Congress’s exclusive power to declare war under article I,
section 8, clause 11 of the Constitution:

Now, therefore,be it
Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate  1
concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that, except  2
in response to an actual or imminent attack against the  3
territory of the United States, the use of offensive military  4

•HCON 107 IH
force by a President without prior and clear authorization  1
of an Act of Congress violates Congress’s exclusive power  2
to declare war under article I, section 8, clause 11 of the  3
Constitution and therefore constitutes an impeachable  4
high crime and misdemeanor under article II, section 4  5
of the Constitution.  6
Æ

And, just in case, the below is a screen capture of the bill page on Thomas.gov taken at 1:50am est March 11, 2012.

H-Con-Res-107-Thomas-Gov-Screenshot.jpg

H-Con-Res-107-Thomas-Gov-Screenshot.jpg

H.R. 347 – What Is The Real Issue? 2012-0306

What’s the real issue with this bill? Of the rants and lamentations I’ve seen, people seem to think this is new. But it isn’t. However, I think the issue is that they have removed a subsection which makes the law subject to the first amendment. What do you think?

I’m curious, but I’ve yet to find out when the original law was written. If anyone has any insight on that, please point us to that information. Thanks

Legislation
HR 347 Text on Govtrack
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h112-347

18 USC § 1752 on Cornell Law
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1752

Examples

Infowars Article
http://www.infowars.com/h-r-347-another-step-in-the-elimination-of-the-first-…

Break The Matrix Article
http://breakthematrix.com/activism/hr-347-goodbye-amendment-trespass-bill-pro…