ALERT – Media Blackout Of Obama Impeachment – H. Con. Res. 107

This bill introduced in the house on March 7, 2012, lays out a case for impeachment of Obama (AKA Barry Soetoro) on grounds of conducting wars without congressional authorization. Yet, the media this weekend are talking about Rush Limbaugh and Peyton Manning.

PLEASE SPREAD

A PDF of the bill from gpo.gov

http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-112hconres107ih/pdf/BILLS-112hconres107ih.pdf

Thomas.gov page for this bill

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c112:H.CON.RES.107:

Govtrack page for this bill

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=hc112-107

I’ve yet to find the bill on OpenCongress.org

For good measure, you can also download the pdf  directly from freemartinnow.wordpress.com:

H. Con. Res. 107 – 2012-0307

IV
112 TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. CON. RES.  107
Expressing the sense of Congress that the use of offensive military force
by a President without prior and clear authorization of an Act of Con-gress constitutes an impeachable high crime and misdemeanor under
article II, section 4 of the Constitution.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
MARCH 7, 2012
Mr. JONES submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred
to the Committee on the Judiciary

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of Congress that the use of offensive
military force by a President without prior and clear
authorization of an Act of Congress constitutes an im-peachable high crime and misdemeanor under article II,
section 4 of the Constitution.

Whereas the cornerstone of the Republic is honoring
Congress’s exclusive power to declare war under article I,
section 8, clause 11 of the Constitution:

Now, therefore,be it
Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate  1
concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that, except  2
in response to an actual or imminent attack against the  3
territory of the United States, the use of offensive military  4

•HCON 107 IH
force by a President without prior and clear authorization  1
of an Act of Congress violates Congress’s exclusive power  2
to declare war under article I, section 8, clause 11 of the  3
Constitution and therefore constitutes an impeachable  4
high crime and misdemeanor under article II, section 4  5
of the Constitution.  6
Æ

And, just in case, the below is a screen capture of the bill page on Thomas.gov taken at 1:50am est March 11, 2012.

H-Con-Res-107-Thomas-Gov-Screenshot.jpg

H-Con-Res-107-Thomas-Gov-Screenshot.jpg

Shepard Smith – What’s The Difference Between Obama and Assad?

Oh, this is priceless. Is there hope for Shepard after all?  I haven’t watched Faux News for quite a while, but such rants from Smith are entertaining as his programming struggles to resist a little dose of reality.

H.R. 347 – What Is The Real Issue? 2012-0306

What’s the real issue with this bill? Of the rants and lamentations I’ve seen, people seem to think this is new. But it isn’t. However, I think the issue is that they have removed a subsection which makes the law subject to the first amendment. What do you think?

I’m curious, but I’ve yet to find out when the original law was written. If anyone has any insight on that, please point us to that information. Thanks

Legislation
HR 347 Text on Govtrack
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h112-347

18 USC § 1752 on Cornell Law
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1752

Examples

Infowars Article
http://www.infowars.com/h-r-347-another-step-in-the-elimination-of-the-first-…

Break The Matrix Article
http://breakthematrix.com/activism/hr-347-goodbye-amendment-trespass-bill-pro…